DIGITAL
PHOTOGRAPHY, a Novice's View
by
Lee Alexander
Dictionary
Definition
Photography:
the art or process of producing images on a sensitized surface by
the action of radiant energy. See, even Merriam-Webster cannot make
up its mind – is it art or just a cut and dried procedure? As it
is with much of nature and its study, science, there is a duality
involved. The elements of radiant energy, particularly - the visible
spectrum of light, are photons. There is that photo- combining term
again. Modern physics hits us with another whammy – photons are
discrete particles but they also behave as waves.
In
the case of DIGITAL photography, what “sensitized surface”? All
we do is spray ink on paper. Thus the purists can have their say
- Digital Photography is not true photography. Here is another arrow
for the purist's quiver – Digital is to steps as Analog is to ramp.
If you go digital, you are obviously throwing away information.
This is a specious argument. With a large number of very small steps
we soon reach the limits of human vision to discern differences.
How many different hues can the human eye perceive? With sixteen
plus million colors available, we pretty well cover that field.
My
Photography Background
What
qualifies me to talk to novices about Digital Photography? Firstly,
in the field of Digital Photography, I am just beyond the beginnings
– I am on my second digital camera. Although I hardly class myself
as a photographer, I am not entirely new to photography. Years ago
(many, if you must ask), I set up a ‘wet' darkroom in a basement
corner. Replete with a homemade enlarger (lens, shutter, bellows,
etc. from Edmunds Scientific), light-tight containers, trays, and
hand-staining chemicals, I embarked on a short lived journey of
exploration. I soon concluded my time, efforts, and cash would better
serve another hobby. I had not even touched color photography at
that point. The skill and patience of “amateur photographers” of
the time should not be taken lightly.
So
I went my merry way, stepping up to an SLR (Single Lens Reflex)
camera with auto exposure. As a typical family man of the era, I
shot photos of the family with an occasional spurt of “creativity”
such as shooting barns in Westchester County . Such excursions proved
I had made the right choice NOT to pursue photography as a full
blown hobby. The expense and time-consuming process of putting an
invisible image onto to film and then waiting to see what a waste
of photo emulsion it was, soon dampened my enthusiasm to “take a
picture.”
For
me, Digital Photography entered the scene in the mid 1990's. I started
to get my photos on floppy disks along with prints and slides. This
was quite a revelation! I could now load photos onto my computer,
do a minimal job of retouching with magical software, and print
copy after copy – all in the comfort of my den. The wet darkroom
was history. However, the source of the photos was still images
on film.
In
1997, I took the next step. My first early foray into the new world
of digital cameras was considerably less than satisfying. The camera
created images of 640 x 480 pixels (less than a third of a Megapixel),
had only internal storage (no removable media) with a capacity of
about 40 low resolution images, and no flash. I had goofed again
as an early adopter of immature technology. On the plus side, I
got an idea of what was required of this new field for the average
Joe and Jane.
The
State of Digital Photography Today
With
that bit of history and philosophy behind us, let's take a peek
at today's status of Digital Photography. Beginning with digital
cameras, we see the marketplace divided into three segments: point-and-shoot
models, a middle ground with considerably more features, and the
prosumer class of high cost SLR's and other models with scads of
Megapixels.
Elements
common to all levels include a body (a familiar concept to those
who have purchased and used high end film cameras) which houses
the lens, viewfinder(s), a light sensitive device, a memory storage
device, and software to convert the output of the light sensitive
device to a format suitable for storage on the memory device.
The
body may be made of plastic, metal, or exotic metals. You can guess
which market class has which body construction. The lens can be
plastic, glass, or an aspheric design. The viewfinder can be a plain
old optical range finder type, an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) [sometimes
both], or an electronic viewer. The characteristics of LCDs vary
in size, brightness, and contrast. You are much better off seeing
the LCD than reading about its parameters.
The
light sensitive device is (essentially) one of two types: a CCD
(Charge Coupled Device) or a CMOS (Complimentary Metal Oxide Semiconductor)
device. Without going into details (after all, this is a novice's
view) the CCD is usually the better of the two. CMOS devices can
be smaller and cheaper to manufacture. CCDs vary in size as well
as the number of pixels (the larger, the better - to gather more
light), resolution (Megapixels), and speed. The foregoing explains
why you cannot expect too much from cameras built into a cell phones
and their ilk.
Memory
storage has a wide range of options. The simplest and cheapest is
internal with no removable media. Once this memory is filled, you
must download its contents into your computer or another device
and then erase the content to make room for more images. Removable
memory devices run a gauntlet of media. Most popular is the solid
state (no moving parts) flash memory. An advantage of flash media
is its usefulness as an exterior “drive” for your computer when
combined with an inexpensive reader.
Flash
Memory Cards:
NAME
SIZE (mm) MAX 128MB/512MB/1GB
YEAR
Compact
Flash (CF) 43 x 36 x 3.3 12GB $22/$64/$140
1994
Secure
Digital (SD) 24 x 32 x 2.2 1GB $33/$95/$270
1999
Memory
Stick PRO 21 x 50 x 2.8 2GB $45/$116/$250
2003
Smart
Media (SM) 37 x 45 x 0.8 128MB $31/NA/NA
1995
xD-Picture
Card 20 x 25 x 1.8 512MB $47/$160/NA
2002
Lastly,
not a solid state memory device but on the order of the same physical
dimensions, we have the MicroDrive (IBM/MagicStor), 2.2 GB at $180
The
question you face is which of these formats will be around in the
future. So far, CF and SD seem to be the best bet.
Presently,
manufacturers tout the resolution in Megapixels as a selling point.
This will not always yield the best picture. Digital or film, we
still have the physics of light and optics to consider. A 6 Megapixel
camera with a so-so lens may not give you as good a photo as a 4
Megapixel one with a better lens.
The
last item mentioned, the conversion software, is an important factor
to the user with little emphasis from the camera manufacturers.
Parameters we should be concerned about are mostly time related:
how long to power up, how long between shots (recycle time), how
long until auto-focus locks in, and the time lag between pressing
the shutter button and recording the actual image. Those used to
fast film cameras must learn to compensate for these factors. Some
typical values are a boot time of 5 seconds and a recycle time of
2-3 seconds (time required before you can take the next picture).
Most mid-priced digital cameras include a “burst mode” function.
This allows for a small number of sequential shots before processing;
however, do not expect the performance of a motorized SLR film camera.
So if you want a quick shot of a child's active romp, an athlete's
launch from the blocks, or a lion disappearing into the bush – better
have your digital camera powered up and ready.
As
mentioned earlier, Digital Photography has aspects that do not even
involve a digital camera. Having your silver halide images rendered
onto media other than paper, for example. Scanning images into your
computer is a popular task for Digital Photography. General purpose
scanners are fine for getting images from prints, provided the scanning
resolution available is sufficient. If you wish to scan negatives
or slides you must go another step. Scanning a print uses reflected
light like scanning a paper document or magazine page. Negatives
and slides require transmitted light and therefore need adapters
that pass light through the image source. Dedicated high resolution
devices for this single purpose can run into serious dollars. Reasonably
priced photo scanners, such as the Epson Perfection series, are
well suited for “home use.”
Okay,
we now have images on our computer, what's next? Photo editing,
a major step forward in the technology, is a logical progression.
The horizon in the image from the camera is not quite horizontal,
shadows of power lines cross the architectural wonder of antiquity,
flash has turned your model's nose into a locomotive headlamp. All
these unwanted artifacts are grist for a photo editing software
mill. The standard of photo editors is Adobe's Photo Shop. At more
than $600, it tends to be a pricey for the beginning digital photographer.
Alternatives abound; from Adobe's own PhotoShop Elements (at $100),
Broderbund's The Print Shop, Microsoft's Digital Image Picture It!,
to freeware such as Irfan View. Whether you are into digital photography
or not, every computer should have a copy of Irfanview. Irfan Skiljan's
image viewer/converter has an almost endless list of formats it
can handle and even does some basic photo editing—AND it is
FREE.
The
last item to cover is printers. This subject is broad enough to
write a book about and there are many. Unfortunately, new models
seem to appear monthly. I will restrict the subject to affordable
(how big is your purse?) inkjets. I will mention, at this point,
if you plan to do a lot of printings in formats of 8 x 10 or larger,
the cost of consumables will soon outweigh the initial hardware
purchase price. You might be in the market for a color laser printer.
Remember, this is just a Novice's viewpoint.
Just
about any late model, general purpose inkjet will produce good prints
at 5 x 7 inches or less. Fairly new to the market are inkjet photo
printers. General purpose inkjets typically use four colors of ink
in either individual cartridges or two cartridges: one black and
the other tri-colored. The four colors are designated as CMYK –
cyan, magenta, yellow, and black.
Photo
printers typically use more than four colors in a mix of cartridges.
Some add light cyan and light magenta to the mix. Others include
red, blue, and a matte black ink for text. The Canon i9900 uses
8 inks and the replacement cost for the cartridges is $96. Quality
of photo prints were rated as “Outstanding”, but text and graphics
garnered only “Good” [PC World, August 2004]. Prices for printers
(within a reasonable budget) range from about $50 to $500. In all
cases, the cost of consumables (special photo paper and ink) will
outweigh the original device cost if you do a considerable amount
of printing.
An
Opinionated Conclusion
Continually
waiting for “the next step” or vaporware means you will never take
the first step in any new undertaking. The state of the art in digital
photography today offers a broad spectrum of price and performance.
The industry appears to be at that point where price reduction is
stalled in favor of “new and improved” products.
Your
photographic tastes should indicate the style and features for your
choice of digital camera – a point-and-shoot model that fits in
a shirt pocket or small purse or an extended zoom with a lens approaching
a telescope. If you already have an inkjet printer, check out its
performance with photos before opting for an upgrade. If you have
been toying with the idea of dipping a toe into these waters, now
is a good time.
|